2017-03-21 IMIHerbert Poenisch, Member of IMI Academic Committee, former Senior Economist, BIS
In the January issue of the IMI Review I described the financial use of RMB overtaking the use for international trade.
In this issue I take the recent decision by SAFE to allow foreigner institutional investors access to derivatives products for hedging their investment in the onshore interbank RMB bond market.
The weak side of internationalization of RMB was always the third function of money, the storage of value. While central banks and sovereign wealth funds have been allowed into the RMB interbank bond market, allowing non-government foreigners, mostly in form of institutional investors under the QFII scheme to participate is relatively new. The next logical step is to allow these foreign institutional investors to hedge their investments in onshore RMB.
This short article first looks at the size of the global institutional investors, who are searching for yields around the globe and the availability of debt securities. Secondly, what does the recent decision by SAFE mean for these global investors and thirdly what are the risks involved.
1. Size of institutional investors and China interbank bond market
The OECD has been collecting data on institutional investors in member countries for many years. It is only recently that this exercise has been fully appreciated as the total funds available to these institutional investors in 2014 were close to USD 100tr, compared with USD 12 tr in official foreign exchange reserves and a global GDP of USD 70bn.
Even a small shift in these funds causes major forex and asset market reverberations. Most of these funds are constrained by strict investment guidelines which allow them to move only marginally.
As shown in figure 1, investments funds, insurance companies and pension funds make up the lion share of the total, some 75% of the total in 2011. They invested mainly in eligible publicly quoted equities and debt securities. The investment and holding periods of different institutional investors vary at any point of time and over time. Investment Funds and Pension Funds allocate a larger share into equity whereas insurance companies have a preference for debt securities.
For comparison, the size of global debt markets in mid-2016 is USD 93 tr, mainly made up USD 72tr of domestic bonds and USD 21 tr of international bonds. The China onshore interbank bond markets amounted to RMB 56.3 tr or USD 8 tr, third in size after the USA and Japan (see table below).
Of this total only RMB 852.6 bn or 1.5% of the onshore interbank bond market are held by overseas investors. This share is much smaller than 9% of Japanese securities and 38% of US issued securities.There is a huge potential from both sides, supply and demand to increase the share of foreign holdings in China’s interbank bond market.
A boost of capital inflows is welcome at present when Chinese authorities are struggling to stem capital outflows.
Table 1: Summary of debt securities outstanding 2Q2016 in bn USD
Source: BIS Securities statistics Table C 1
2. Recent SAFE decision on hedging in the interbank bond market
Interbank bond market is a misnomer as it covers more than 90% of all traded bonds.
The recent decision to allow foreigners buying onshore bonds in China to hedge their currency risk is a major step forward to attracting international investment in its booming debt markets. These hedging transactions can be concluded with Chinese residents (banks foremost) and include forward contracts, swaps and options.
These measures are targeted at non-central banks, foreign institutional investors, including pension funds, charities and other investors who invest in China’s bond market through the Qualified Institutional Investor (QFII) programme. Foreign investors must trade the derivatives through a qualified onshore financial institution and conduct such trading based on ‘real needs’ for risk hedging. This requires verification to avoid speculative hedging.
Until now many foreign investors have been using derivatives available in the RMB offshore market, which is a costly and time consuming practice. In future China might be easing administrative measures, such as favourable tax policies, extended trading hours and shorter settlement periods. This will prove a challenge for the China International Payment System which will have to include settlement of bonds and derivatives with a central securities depository set (CSD) up.
3. Risks for foreign investors
Foreigners can now hedge their foreign exchange risk at a cost, bearing in mind the widely expected depreciation of RMB. Furthermore foreign investors still carry the interest risk, which in an environment of expected globally rising interest rates from which China cannot exclude itself, is not negligible.This step is also important as in most advanced bond markets the interest swap rate serves as a benchmark.
“Much remains to do with designing and operating a Chinese Government Bond market that will provide an efficient yield curve to find out the optimal interest rates from one year to fifty years”. At present this is a captive market as Chinese banks hold the bulk of CGBs. Furthermore, the absence of institutional investors diminishes the urgency to create a yield curve and for the PBOC to use this as basis for its operations.
Recent improvement in monetary operating procedures by introducing an interest corridor should facilitate the use of interest rate derivatives. The PBOC should be the leading institution to shape an ‘optimal’ structure for the CGBs yield curve. “In order to fulfill this societal responsibility, PBOC should design, develop and operate an effective and efficient monetary policy to manage RMB as an international currency”.
It therefore remains to be seen how much these measures help to attract foreign capital at a time when China is facing massive capital outflows.Selling more domestic debt securities to foreigners is a double edged sword, the inflows are welcome but reversals can cause stress for monetary policy. Enforcing strict capital controls is a return to administrative measures which is a temporary setback for the internationalisation of RMB. The outside world expected more market determined exchange rates and interest rates.